Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Willis White
Appearance
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. Sandstein 19:56, 26 September 2018 (UTC)
[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!
- Willis White (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
A self-promotion puffery piece of a mediocre actor/singer Staszek Lem (talk) 17:48, 19 September 2018 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Actors and filmmakers-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU(T) 19:34, 19 September 2018 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Bands and musicians-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU(T) 19:35, 19 September 2018 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Television-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU(T) 19:35, 19 September 2018 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Kansas-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU(T) 19:35, 19 September 2018 (UTC)
- Delete does indeed appear to be promotional in nature and the sources cited aren't exactly what we would use to show WP:GNG.--Paul McDonald (talk) 20:17, 19 September 2018 (UTC)
Weak Keep the article itself is not of terribly high quality but I think the subject has established some notability given his mentions in the Examiner and Daily Northwestern. OTOH, much of his notability is given from IMDb and associated databases, which if I am not mistaken are of debated reliability on Wikipedia.John M Wolfson (talk) 00:50, 23 September 2018 (UTC)- "Mentions" not enough. Notability requires "significant coverage". Staszek Lem (talk) 19:06, 24 September 2018 (UTC)
- In that case the Examiner article gives him main focus, but is highly subjective and promotional, with the Northwestern article mentioning him once in passing. A Google Search gives only this article and one page of social media links before bringing up irrelevant results. Delete --John M Wolfson (talk) 05:18, 25 September 2018 (UTC)
- "Mentions" not enough. Notability requires "significant coverage". Staszek Lem (talk) 19:06, 24 September 2018 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.